EAT:NYE-Brinker International, Inc (USD)

COMMON STOCK | Restaurants | NYE

Last Closing Price

USD 28.42

Change

+1.51 (+5.61)%

Market Cap

USD 0.99B

Volume

4.69M

Average Target Price

USD 28.45 (+0.10%)
Average Analyst Rating

Verdict

Fundamental Analysis

Verdict

About

Brinker International, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates, and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. As of September 25, 2019, it owned, operated, or franchised 1,672 restaurants comprising 1,619 restaurants under the Chili's Grill & Bar name and 53 restaurants under the Maggiano's Little Italy brand name. The company was founded in 1975 and is based in Dallas, Texas.

Technical Indicators

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2020-06-03 )

Largest Industry Peers for Restaurants

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap Price / Earning Ratio EV/EBITDA
MCD McDonald's Corporation

+5.70 (+3.04%)

USD139.48B 24.74 18.00
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc

-9.18 (-0.87%)

USD29.53B 87.69 38.32
YUM Yum! Brands, Inc

+2.35 (+2.55%)

USD27.25B 25.28 21.23
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc

+1.47 (+3.09%)

USD17.83B 32.41 12.56
QSR Restaurant Brands Internationa..

+1.46 (+2.56%)

USD16.85B 23.52 13.37
DPZ Domino's Pizza, Inc

+5.28 (+1.37%)

USD15.00B 36.78 27.11
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc

+7.81 (+10.00%)

USD10.14B 15.21 12.38
ARMK Aramark

+1.35 (+5.09%)

USD6.63B 58.84 11.85
CNNE Cannae Holdings, Inc

-0.28 (-0.77%)

USD2.85B 3.63 2.23
SHAK Shake Shack Inc

+2.11 (+3.94%)

USD2.25B 111.10 40.09

ETFs Containing EAT

Symbol Name Weight Mer Price(Change) Market Cap
CSML IQ Chaikin U.S. Small Cap.. 0.31 % 0.35 %

+0.71 (+3.34%)

USD0.10B

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs.
Industry/Classification (Restaurants)
Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain -32.33% 44% F 18% F
Dividend Return 0.90% 64% D 40% F
Total Return -31.43% 44% F 18% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain -29.20% 35% F 22% F
Dividend Return 3.79% 100% A+ 74% C
Total Return -25.41% 47% F 23% F
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain -49.85% 23% F 20% F
Dividend Return 12.53% 56% F 49% F
Total Return -37.32% 23% F 20% F
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain -5.45% 24% F 20% F
Dividend Return 3.29% 90% A- 65% D
Total Return -2.16% 24% F 21% F
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 26.15% 47% F 31% F
Risk Adjusted Return -8.26% 24% F 21% F
Market Capitalization 0.99B 44% F 57% F
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Key Financial Ratios

  Ratio vs. Industry/Classification
(Restaurants)
Ratio vs. Market
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
Market Value  
Price / Earning Ratio 8.37 76% C 77% C+
Price/Book Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Price / Cash Flow Ratio 4.67 61% D- 54% F
EV/EBITDA 10.31 67% D+ 51% F
Management Effectiveness  
Return on Equity N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Return on Invested Capital 38.30% 89% B+ 98% A+
Return on Assets 7.09% 83% B 87% B+
Debt to Equity Ratio -155.05% 87% B+ 97% A+
Technical Ratios  
Short Ratio 1.97 61% D- 48% F
Short Percent 29.45% 6% F 26% F
Beta 2.19 17% F 9% F
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

Fundamental Analysis Breakdown

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Superior total returns

The stock has outperformed its sector peers on average annual total returns basis in the past 5 years (for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

Underpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

Superior capital utilization

The company management has delivered better return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior return on assets

The company management has delivered better return on assets in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

High Gross Profit to Asset Ratio

This stock is in the top quartile compared to its peers on Gross Profit to Asset Ratio. This is a popular measure among value investors for showing superior returns in the long run.

What to not like:
Low market capitalization

This is among the smaller entities in its sectors with below median market capitalization. That may make it less stable in the long run unless it has a unique technology or market which can help it grow or get acquired in future.

Poor risk adjusted returns

This company is delivering below median risk adjusted returns in its peers. Even if it is outperforming on returns , the returns are unpredictable. Proceed with caution.

High volatility

The total returns for this company are volatile and above median for its sector over the past 5 years. Make sure you have the risk tolerance for investing in such stock.

Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector