BROG:NSD-Brooge Energy Limited (USD)

COMMON STOCK | Oil & Gas Midstream | NSD

Last Closing Price

USD 11.15

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

USD 1.19B

Volume

100.00

Average Target Price

USD 13.00 (+16.59%)
Average Analyst Rating

Verdict

Fundamental Analysis

Verdict

About

Brooge Energy Limited provides oil storage and services in the Port of Fujairah. The company owns, operates, and leases terminal and storage facilities comprising 14 oil storage tanks with an aggregate geometric oil storage capacity of approximately 399,324 cubic meters and related infrastructure for the storage, heating, and blending of fuel oil and clean petroleum products, including aviation fuel, gas oil, gasoline, marine gas oil, and naphtha. It also provides ancillary services, which include blending and circulation, heating, throughput, and intertank transfer. The company was formerly known as Brooge Holdings Limited and changed its name to Brooge Energy Limited in April 2020. Brooge Energy Limited is headquartered in Fujairah, the United Arab Emirates.

Company Website : http://www.broogeholdings.com

Address : Al Sayegh Centre Hamdan Street, Fujairah, United Arab Emirates

Fiscal Year End : December

Currency: USD

Country : USA

Technical Indicators

Beta : 0.00

52 Week High : 13.98

Short Ratio : 8.25

52 Week Low : 7.76

Shorted Shares : 58,526

200 Day Moving Average : 9.53

Shorted Shares Previous Month : 48,739

50 Day Moving Average : 10.40

Shares Held By Insiders : 52.05%

Shares Held by Institutions : 3.2%

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2021-01-22 )

Largest Industry Peers for Oil & Gas Midstream

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap Price / Earning Ratio EV/EBITDA
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, ..

-0.02 (-0.22%)

 USD6.64B 2.69 4.93
VNOM Viper Energy Partners LP

+0.26 (+1.81%)

 USD2.27B 10.40 14.99
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P

+0.02 (+0.21%)

 USD1.77B 3.64 3.56
RTLR Rattler Midstream LP

+0.19 (+1.99%)

 USD1.45B 13.18 9.01
GLNG Golar LNG Limited

-0.08 (-0.70%)

 USD1.25B 25.30 18.21
NBLX Noble Midstream Partners LP

-0.13 (-1.03%)

 USD1.14B 7.94 11.57
ALTM Altus Midstream Company

-0.51 (-1.06%)

 USD0.78B 16.18 N/A
TRMD TORM plc

-0.09 (-1.20%)

 USD0.56B 2.03 2.88
OMP Oasis Midstream Partners LP

-0.24 (-1.64%)

 USD0.49B 119.02 6.29
BKEPP Blueknight Energy Partners, L...

-0.04 (-0.57%)

 USD0.30B N/A N/A

ETFs Containing BROG

Symbol Name Weight Mer Price(Change) Market Cap

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs.
Industry/Classification (Oil & Gas Midstream)		 Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 8.67% 40% F 56% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 8.67% 40% F 56% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 19.64% 87% B+ 58% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 19.64% 87% B+ 57% F
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain -0.76% 87% B+ 36% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return -0.76% 80% B- 31% F
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 8.23% 100% A+ 90% A-
Risk Adjusted Return -9.20% 73% C 29% F
Market Capitalization 1.19B 67% D+ 66% D
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Key Financial Ratios

  Ratio vs. Industry/Classification
(Oil & Gas Midstream)		 Ratio vs. Market
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
Market Value  
Price / Earning Ratio 53.50 15% F 22% F
Price/Book Ratio 8.95 18% F 19% F
Price / Cash Flow Ratio 22.32 7% F 19% F
EV/EBITDA 50.84 8% F 18% F
Management Effectiveness  
Return on Equity -62.59% 18% F 19% F
Return on Invested Capital -53.41% 7% F 18% F
Return on Assets 6.51% 60% D- 89% B+
Debt to Equity Ratio 59.27% 58% F 38% F
Technical Ratios  
Short Ratio 8.25 7% F 12% F
Short Percent 0.38% 67% D+ 90% A-
Beta 0.00 100% A+ 96% A
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

Fundamental Analysis Breakdown

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Low volatility

The stock’s annual returns have been stable and consistent compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile. Although stability is good, also keep in mind it can limit returns.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
Overpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is above the sector median.

Overpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading high compared to its peers median on a price to book value basis.

Overpriced on cashflow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Overpriced on free cash flow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to free cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector