AJMPF:OTC-Ashmore Group PLC (USD)

COMMON STOCK | Asset Management | OTC

Last Closing Price

USD 6.00

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

USD 4.39B

Average Target Price

N/A
Average Analyst Rating

N/A

Fundamental Analysis

Verdict

About

Ashmore Group plc is a publicly owned investment manager. The firm primarily provides its services to retail and institutional clients. It manages separate client-focused equity and fixed income portfolios. The firm also launches and manages equity and fixed income mutual funds for its clients. It invests in the public equity and fixed income markets in emerging markets across the globe. The firm employs combination of fundamental analysis to make its investments. Ashmore Group Plc was founded in 1992 and is based in London, United Kingdom.

Technical Indicators

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2021-01-15 )

Largest Industry Peers for Asset Management

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap Price / Earning Ratio EV/EBITDA
IVSXF Investor AB (publ)

N/A

USD56.63B 11.86 1.68
IVSBF Investor AB (publ)

N/A

USD56.63B 11.93 1.68
PGPHF Partners Group Holding AG

+10.98 (+0.93%)

USD31.05B 39.98 30.19
TGOPF 3i Group plc

N/A

USD30.28B 7.68 N/A
GBLBF Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA

-4.11 (-3.98%)

USD15.66B 26.50 18.41
GBLBY Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA

N/A

USD15.66B 26.01 18.41
CHYYY CHYYY

N/A

USD15.54B 13.20 -5.40
TGOPY 3i Group plc

+0.04 (+0.45%)

USD15.06B 7.60 N/A
JBARF Julius Bär Gruppe AG

N/A

USD13.52B 15.51 N/A
JBAXY Julius Bär Gruppe AG

-0.05 (-0.40%)

USD13.46B 16.77 N/A

ETFs Containing AJMPF

Symbol Name Weight Mer Price(Change) Market Cap

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs.
Industry/Classification (Asset Management)
Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain -0.83% 27% F 32% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return -0.83% 27% F 32% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain -17.47% 33% F 29% F
Dividend Return 2.19% 29% F 46% F
Total Return -15.28% 33% F 30% F
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain 99.34% 66% D 68% D+
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 99.34% 66% D 67% D+
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain 9.78% 62% D- 59% F
Dividend Return 0.61% 28% F 24% F
Total Return 10.38% 59% F 57% F
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 22.34% 67% D+ 69% D+
Risk Adjusted Return 46.49% 86% B 77% C+
Market Capitalization 4.39B 83% B 81% B-
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Key Financial Ratios

  Ratio vs. Industry/Classification
(Asset Management)
Ratio vs. Market
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
Market Value  
Price / Earning Ratio 21.28 28% F 35% F
Price/Book Ratio 3.82 15% F 30% F
Price / Cash Flow Ratio 21.62 20% F 9% F
EV/EBITDA 15.86 24% F 23% F
Management Effectiveness  
Return on Equity 21.31% 88% B+ 91% A-
Return on Invested Capital 21.77% 85% B 84% B
Return on Assets 12.78% 91% A- 97% A+
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Technical Ratios  
Short Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Short Percent N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Beta 1.39 33% F 31% F
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

Fundamental Analysis Breakdown

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Superior risk adjusted returns

This stock has performed well, on a risk adjusted basis, compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

Superior return on equity

The company management has delivered better return on equity in the most recent 4 quarters then its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior capital utilization

The company management has delivered better return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior return on assets

The company management has delivered better return on assets in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

High Gross Profit to Asset Ratio

This stock is in the top quartile compared to its peers on Gross Profit to Asset Ratio. This is a popular measure among value investors for showing superior returns in the long run.

What to not like:
Below median total returns

The company has under performed its peers on annual average total returns in the past 5 years.

Overpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is above the sector median.

Overpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading high compared to its peers median on a price to book value basis.

Overpriced on cashflow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Overpriced on free cash flow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to free cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector