CDM:LSE-Codemasters Group Holdings plc (GBX)

COMMON STOCK | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | LSE

Last Closing Price

GBX 602.00

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

GBX 0.92B

Volume

1.94M

Average Target Price

GBX 420.00 (-30.23%)
Average Analyst Rating

Verdict

Fundamental Analysis

Verdict

About

Codemasters Group Holdings plc, together with its subsidiaries, develops and sells racing games in the United Kingdom, rest of Europe, the United States, Australia, and internationally. The company's game portfolio comprise F1 series, GRID, DiRT Rally 2.0, and ONRUSH. It also offers interactive entertainment software. The company was incorporated in 2007 and is headquartered in Southam, the United Kingdom. Address: Codemasters Campus, Southam, United Kingdom, CV47 2DL

Technical Indicators

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2021-01-20 )

Largest Industry Peers for Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap Price / Earning Ratio EV/EBITDA
KWS:LSE Keywords Studios plc

+82.00 (+3.22%)

GBX1.96B 126.54 36.98
FDEV:LSE Frontier Developments plc

-225.00 (-6.56%)

GBX1.26B 81.35 37.53
TM17:LSE Team17 Group PLC

-10.00 (-1.18%)

GBX1.10B 57.40 39.82
SUMO:LSE Sumo Group Plc

+5.00 (+1.57%)

GBX0.55B 48.79 43.78
BIDS:LSE Bidstack Group Plc

+0.30 (+2.94%)

GBX0.04B N/A N/A
MOS:LSE Mobile Streams Plc

N/A

GBX2.71M N/A N/A
NKTN:LSE Nektan plc

N/A

GBX2.10M N/A N/A

ETFs Containing CDM

Symbol Name Weight Mer Price(Change) Market Cap

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs.
Industry/Classification (Electronic Gaming & Multimedia)
Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain -7.95% 29% F 5% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return -7.95% 29% F 5% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 100.67% 86% B 94% A
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 100.67% 86% B 94% A
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain 31.10% 43% F 86% B
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 31.10% 43% F 85% B
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 39.66% 86% B 26% F
Risk Adjusted Return 78.41% 71% C- 83% B
Market Capitalization 0.92B 57% F 80% B-
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Key Financial Ratios

  Ratio vs. Industry/Classification
(Electronic Gaming & Multimedia)
Ratio vs. Market
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
Market Value  
Price / Earning Ratio 42.39 100% A+ 20% F
Price/Book Ratio 8.32 57% F 10% F
Price / Cash Flow Ratio 27.67 71% C- 16% F
EV/EBITDA 13.62 100% A+ 43% F
Management Effectiveness  
Return on Equity 24.96% 100% A+ 92% A-
Return on Invested Capital 24.07% 100% A+ 92% A-
Return on Assets 18.72% 100% A+ 98% A+
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Technical Ratios  
Short Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Short Percent N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Beta 1.49 14% F 12% F
Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage Letter Grade Percentage
A+ 97%-100% A 93%-96% A- 90%-92%
B+ 97%-89% B 83%-86% B- 80%-82%
C+ 77%-79% C 73%-76% C- 70%-72%
D+ 67%-69% D 63%-66% D- 60%-62%
F 0%-59%

Annual Financials (GBX)

Quarterly Financials (GBX)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

Fundamental Analysis Breakdown

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Low volatility

The stock’s annual returns have been stable and consistent compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile. Although stability is good, also keep in mind it can limit returns.

Underpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

Superior return on equity

The company management has delivered better return on equity in the most recent 4 quarters then its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior capital utilization

The company management has delivered better return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior return on assets

The company management has delivered better return on assets in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Underpriced on free cash flow basis

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to free cash flow basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

High Gross Profit to Asset Ratio

This stock is in the top quartile compared to its peers on Gross Profit to Asset Ratio. This is a popular measure among value investors for showing superior returns in the long run.

What to not like:
Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

Overpriced on free cash flow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to free cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector