Central Asia Metals plc, together with its subsidiaries, mines and explores for mineral properties. It primarily explores for copper, zinc, lead, and silver deposits. It holds 100% interests in the solvent extraction- electrowinning copper plant located near the city of Balkhash in central Kazakhstan; and Sasa mine located in north eastern Macedonia. The company was incorporated in 2005 and is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Company Website : http://www.centralasiametals.com
Address : Sackville House, London, United Kingdom, W1J 0DR
Employees : 1,023
Fiscal Year End : December
Currency: GBX
Country : UK
Beta : 0.99
52 Week High : 298.00
52 Week Low : 152.51
200 Day Moving Average : 254.24
50 Day Moving Average : 238.76
Shares Held By Insiders : 7.18%
Shares Held by Institutions : 67.81999999999999%
| Symbol | Name | Price(Change) | Market Cap | Price / Earning Ratio | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANTO:LSE | Antofagasta plc |
-2.00 (-0.14%) |
GBX14.19B | 18.65 | 3.40 |
| KAZ:LSE | KAZ Minerals PLC |
N/A |
GBX4.02B | 9.28 | 4.95 |
| ATYM:LSE | Atalaya Mining Plc |
N/A |
GBX0.43B | 5.55 | 2.84 |
| Symbol | Name | Weight | Mer | Price(Change) | Market Cap |
|---|
N/A
| Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Copper) |
Market Performance vs. Exchange | ||||||
| Value | Sector Median | Percentile Rank | Grade | Market Median | Percentile Rank | Grade | |
| YTD | |||||||
| Capital Gain | -0.21% | 33% | F | 30% | F | ||
| Dividend Return | 0.03% | 50% | F | 36% | F | ||
| Total Return | -0.18% | 33% | F | 29% | F | ||
| Trailing 12 Months | |||||||
| Capital Gain | 57.98% | 67% | D+ | 80% | B- | ||
| Dividend Return | 4.01% | 100% | A+ | 88% | B+ | ||
| Total Return | 61.99% | 67% | D+ | 81% | B- | ||
| Trailing 5 Years | |||||||
| Capital Gain | 31.77% | 33% | F | 55% | F | ||
| Dividend Return | 28.93% | 100% | A+ | 91% | A- | ||
| Total Return | 60.70% | 33% | F | 68% | D+ | ||
| Average Annual (5 Year Horizon) | |||||||
| Capital Gain | 18.08% | 33% | F | 76% | C | ||
| Dividend Return | 4.80% | 100% | A+ | 87% | B+ | ||
| Total Return | 22.87% | 33% | F | 77% | C+ | ||
| Risk Return Profile | |||||||
| Volatility (Standard Deviation) | 458.51% | 33% | F | 10% | F | ||
| Risk Adjusted Return | 4.99% | 33% | F | 24% | F | ||
| Market Capitalization | 0.41B | 33% | F | 54% | F | ||
| Letter Grade | Percentage | Letter Grade | Percentage | Letter Grade | Percentage |
| A+ | 97%-100% | A | 93%-96% | A- | 90%-92% |
| B+ | 87%-89% | B | 83%-86% | B- | 80%-82% |
| C+ | 77%-79% | C | 73%-76% | C- | 70%-72% |
| D+ | 67%-69% | D | 63%-66% | D- | 60%-62% |
| F | 0%-59% |
| Ratio vs. Industry/Classification (Copper) |
Ratio vs. Market |
||||||
| Value | Sector Median | Percentile Rank | Grade | Market Median | Percentile Rank | Grade | |
| Market Value | |||||||
| Price / Earning Ratio | 10.26 | 67% | D+ | 69% | D+ | ||
| Price/Book Ratio | 1.42 | 67% | D+ | 54% | F | ||
| Price / Cash Flow Ratio | 6.11 | 100% | A+ | 56% | F | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.68 | 33% | F | 86% | B | ||
| Management Effectiveness | |||||||
| Return on Equity | 15.14% | 33% | F | 68% | D+ | ||
| Return on Invested Capital | 11.12% | 100% | A+ | 80% | B- | ||
| Return on Assets | 9.91% | 33% | F | 83% | B | ||
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 8.23% | 100% | A+ | 73% | C | ||
| Technical Ratios | |||||||
| Short Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Short Percent | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Beta | 0.99 | 67% | D+ | 55% | F | ||
| Letter Grade | Percentage | Letter Grade | Percentage | Letter Grade | Percentage |
| A+ | 97%-100% | A | 93%-96% | A- | 90%-92% |
| B+ | 97%-89% | B | 83%-86% | B- | 80%-82% |
| C+ | 77%-79% | C | 73%-76% | C- | 70%-72% |
| D+ | 67%-69% | D | 63%-66% | D- | 60%-62% |
| F | 0%-59% |
| Target Price Action | Rating Action | Analyst | Rating | Price | Date |
|---|
No discussions yet
| User Name | Target Rating | Target Horizon (Months) | Target Price | User Analysis | Date | Comment |
|---|
This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.
The stock has outperformed its sector peers on average annual total returns basis in the past 5 years (for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.
The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.
The company management has delivered better return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.
The company is less leveraged than its peers ,, and is among the top quartile, which makes it more flexible. However, do check the news and look at its sector. Sometimes this is low because the company is not growing and has no growth potential.
The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.
The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.
This stock has shown top quartile revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector.
This stock is in the top quartile compared to its peers on Gross Profit to Asset Ratio. This is a popular measure among value investors for showing superior returns in the long run.
This is among the smaller entities in its sectors with below median market capitalization. That may make it less stable in the long run unless it has a unique technology or market which can help it grow or get acquired in future.
This company is delivering below median risk adjusted returns in its peers. Even if it is outperforming on returns , the returns are unpredictable. Proceed with caution.
The total returns for this company are volatile and above median for its sector over the past 5 years. Make sure you have the risk tolerance for investing in such stock.
The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.
The company management has delivered below median return on equity in the most recent 4 quarters compared to its peers.
The company management has delivered below median return on assets in the most recent 4 quarters compared to its peers.
Do not have an account? Register here
